Galactic North by Alastair Reynolds
This is a collection of short stories set in Reynolds' Revelation Space Universe, home thus far to four novels and two novellas. They are set in a core sample of eras from that universe, starting in the near future and proceeding to far distant millenia. Like most of Reynolds' work, they tend to be about assorted cyborgs with warring agendas being forced to work together to survive some technology out of control. One of the mainstays of Reynolds' shorts is that you can guess there will be a twist coming in the last few pages, and he does an excellent job of setting up red herrings, so you're never sure what the twist will be. This is both a good collection of stories in its own right, and a good introduction to the RS Universe, so: Recommended.A Case of Conscience by James Blish
This was one of the few Hugo-winning novels I'd never read (though I'd thought I had, until I realized it wasn't part of the Cities in Flight arc). Premise: A Jesuit biologist is part of a team investigating a world of intelligent aliens, and what he learns about their biology shakes him to his core.The problem here is that the novel depends on the conceit that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny is A) actually true, and B) that the Catholic church regards it as threatening ('cause it's "proof" of evolution, you see). The aliens in this world go through the same recapitulation as humans, but as children, not as embryos, thus providing visible "proof" of evolution. Our protagonist thus decides that this world, despite being an apparent utopia, must be the work of the devil, and is a threat to the souls of all humanity.
So, yes, two problems, really. First, the plot depends upon the reader accepting recapitulation theory as being true, when it was completely disproven even in the 1950s, when this book was written. Second, we have to emphasize with our Jesuit hero, who believes these benevolent aliens must be wiped out because they are proof that God is not necessary or real. It's kind of hard to find him sympathetic.
All that said, I generally approve when SF bothers to acknowledge that current religions might still exist in the future, and while I find the hero misguided, I still liked his intellectual rigor, founded on false premises though it may be. Moderately recommended.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 01:24 pm (UTC)And then I did my due-dilligence googling, and am more informed than I was ten minutes ago.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-27 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 07:39 pm (UTC)Seems like a sensible view to me; I mean, if god had intended for breasts to be visible, we'd be born naked.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 07:48 pm (UTC)Doc Savage was a fun and quick read when I was a teen, but he certainly could have used a more defined personality!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-27 10:50 am (UTC)Though I still favour the other book in that set - Doctor Mirabilis - if only for Bacon's fever-dream of the future.
--
Phil Masters