woodwardiocom: (Me Arms Looking Left BW)
woodwardiocom ([personal profile] woodwardiocom) wrote2013-10-04 09:53 am

The Difference Is...

Three parallel situations:
  • "You didn't have a bike lock? No wonder it got stolen, you doofus."
  • "You walked through that part of town at midnight waving around an expensive cell phone? You idiot, no wonder you got mugged!"
  • "You were dressed like that when you were sexually assaulted? You kinda asked for it."
My social circles regard the first two as appropriate replies, and the third as absolutely not. I agree with that, but on analysis, am having trouble articulating the relevant distinction.

Edit: Many thanks for the answers thus far. They've helped.

[identity profile] jordan179.livejournal.com 2013-10-06 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
It's not a matter of "ok." It's a matter of wise. You have a right to be secure in both your person and property, and those who harm either are criminals who should be punished. But you would be unwise to ignore the existence of criminals in the real world.